1952 Allard Safari vs. 2006 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard Safari would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 275 more horse power than 1952 Allard Safari. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard Safari.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Allard Safari. (203 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Allard Safari.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard Safari | 2006 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Allard | Holden |
Model | Safari | Commodore |
Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3621 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 290 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |