1952 Allard Safari vs. 2008 Peugeot 406
To start off, 2008 Peugeot 406 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard Safari would be higher. At 3,621 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard Safari weights approximately 51 kg more than 2008 Peugeot 406.
Because 1952 Allard Safari is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard Safari. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Peugeot 406, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Allard Safari (203 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Peugeot 406. (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 1952 Allard Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Peugeot 406.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard Safari | 2008 Peugeot 406 | |
Make | Allard | Peugeot |
Model | Safari | 406 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3621 cc | 1997 cc |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77.8 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.1:1 | 10.8:1 |
Top Speed | 137 km/hour | 208 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 70 L |