1952 Allard Safari vs. 2009 Toyota Matrix

To start off, 2009 Toyota Matrix is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard Safari would be higher. At 3,621 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1952 Allard Safari. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard Safari weights approximately 146 kg more than 2009 Toyota Matrix.

Because 1952 Allard Safari is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard Safari. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Toyota Matrix (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Allard Safari. (203 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2009 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Allard Safari. 2009 Toyota Matrix has automatic transmission and 1952 Allard Safari has manual transmission. 1952 Allard Safari will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Toyota Matrix will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Allard Safari 2009 Toyota Matrix
Make Allard Toyota
Model Safari Matrix
Year Released 1952 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3621 cc 2362 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 85 HP 158 HP
Engine RPM 3800 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 203 Nm 220 Nm
Torque RPM 1500 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 6.1:1 9.8:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1476 kg 1330 kg
Vehicle Length 5040 mm 4400 mm
Vehicle Width 1810 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1530 mm 1560 mm
Wheelbase Size 2850 mm 2610 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 81 L 50 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]