1952 Allard Safari vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard Safari would be higher. At 3,621 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1952 Allard Safari. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard Safari.
Because 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard Safari. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Allard Safari. (203 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Allard Safari.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard Safari | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Allard | Citroen |
Model | Safari | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3621 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77.8 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.1:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |