1952 Allard Safari vs. 2010 SsangYong Chairman W
To start off, 2010 SsangYong Chairman W is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard Safari would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 SsangYong Chairman W is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 SsangYong Chairman W (302 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1952 Allard Safari. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 SsangYong Chairman W should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard Safari.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 SsangYong Chairman W has automatic transmission and 1952 Allard Safari has manual transmission. 1952 Allard Safari will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 SsangYong Chairman W will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard Safari | 2010 SsangYong Chairman W | |
| Make | Allard | SsangYong |
| Model | Safari | Chairman W |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3621 cc | 4966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 302 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Top Speed | 137 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 7-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 5410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1895 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3270 mm |
