1952 Allard Safari vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard Safari would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard Safari weights approximately 136 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 1952 Allard Safari is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard Safari. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Allard Safari (203 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1952 Allard Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard Safari | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Allard | Mini |
Model | Safari | Countryman |
Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77.8 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4097 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1993 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 47 L |