1952 Alvis TB 21 vs. 1997 Ford Puma
To start off, 1997 Ford Puma is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alvis TB 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alvis TB 21 would be higher. At 2,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Alvis TB 21 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Puma (123 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1952 Alvis TB 21. (91 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1952 Alvis TB 21.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Alvis TB 21 (204 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Ford Puma. (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1952 Alvis TB 21 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Alvis TB 21 | 1997 Ford Puma | |
| Make | Alvis | Ford |
| Model | TB 21 | Puma |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2992 cc | 1679 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 91 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 204 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2450 mm |
