1952 Alvis TB 21 vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alvis TB 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alvis TB 21 would be higher. At 2,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Alvis TB 21 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Celica (189 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1952 Alvis TB 21. (91 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1952 Alvis TB 21.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Alvis TB 21 (204 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Celica. (180 Nm @ 6800 RPM). This means 1952 Alvis TB 21 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Alvis TB 21 | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Alvis | Toyota |
| Model | TB 21 | Celica |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2992 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 91 HP | 189 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7800 RPM |
| Torque | 204 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 82.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 11.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2610 mm |
