1952 Alvis TB 21 vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alvis TB 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alvis TB 21 would be higher. At 2,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Alvis TB 21 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda CU-X (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1952 Alvis TB 21. (91 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X should accelerate faster than 1952 Alvis TB 21.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Alvis TB 21. (204 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Alvis TB 21.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Alvis TB 21 | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
| Make | Alvis | Mazda |
| Model | TB 21 | CU-X |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2992 cc | 1970 cc |
| Horse Power | 91 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 204 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2680 mm |
