1952 Alvis TB 21 vs. 2003 MCC ForFour
To start off, 2003 MCC ForFour is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alvis TB 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alvis TB 21 would be higher. At 2,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Alvis TB 21 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC ForFour (93 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1952 Alvis TB 21. (91 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC ForFour should accelerate faster than 1952 Alvis TB 21.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Alvis TB 21 (204 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC ForFour. (125 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1952 Alvis TB 21 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC ForFour.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alvis TB 21 | 2003 MCC ForFour | |
Make | Alvis | MCC |
Model | TB 21 | ForFour |
Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2992 cc | 1331 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 204 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 75.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2510 mm |