1952 Alvis TB 21 vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alvis TB 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alvis TB 21 would be higher. At 2,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Alvis TB 21 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Alvis TB 21 (91 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2003 Renault Clio. (73 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Alvis TB 21 should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Alvis TB 21 (204 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1952 Alvis TB 21 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Alvis TB 21 | 2003 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Alvis | Renault |
| Model | TB 21 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2992 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 91 HP | 73 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 204 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 76.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2480 mm |
