1952 Alvis TB 21 vs. 2006 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2006 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alvis TB 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alvis TB 21 would be higher. At 2,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Alvis TB 21 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 SsangYong Rexton (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1952 Alvis TB 21. (91 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1952 Alvis TB 21.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 SsangYong Rexton (340 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Alvis TB 21. (204 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2006 SsangYong Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Alvis TB 21.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alvis TB 21 | 2006 SsangYong Rexton | |
Make | Alvis | SsangYong |
Model | TB 21 | Rexton |
Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2992 cc | 2696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 204 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 86.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 92.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2830 mm |