1952 Alvis TB 21 vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alvis TB 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alvis TB 21 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (307 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 1952 Alvis TB 21. (91 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1952 Alvis TB 21.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (374 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Alvis TB 21. (204 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Alvis TB 21.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Alvis TB 21 | 2009 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Alvis | Cadillac |
| Model | TB 21 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2992 cc | 3564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 91 HP | 307 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 204 Nm | 374 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 85.6 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2890 mm |
