1952 Alvis TB 21 vs. 2009 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alvis TB 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alvis TB 21 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (358 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 267 more horse power than 1952 Alvis TB 21. (91 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1952 Alvis TB 21.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (527 Nm @ 4350 RPM) has 323 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Alvis TB 21. (204 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Alvis TB 21.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Alvis TB 21 | 2009 Jeep Commander | |
| Make | Alvis | Jeep |
| Model | TB 21 | Commander |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2992 cc | 5654 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 91 HP | 358 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 204 Nm | 527 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4350 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2790 mm |
