1952 Alvis TB 21 vs. 2009 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2009 Kia Cee'd is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alvis TB 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alvis TB 21 would be higher. At 2,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Alvis TB 21 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Cee'd (108 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1952 Alvis TB 21. (91 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 1952 Alvis TB 21.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Alvis TB 21 (204 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Kia Cee'd. (137 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1952 Alvis TB 21 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Kia Cee'd.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alvis TB 21 | 2009 Kia Cee'd | |
Make | Alvis | Kia |
Model | TB 21 | Cee'd |
Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2992 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 204 Nm | 137 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 77.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 74.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2660 mm |