1952 Alvis TB 21 vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alvis TB 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alvis TB 21 would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1952 Alvis TB 21. (91 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1952 Alvis TB 21.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (269 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Alvis TB 21. (204 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Alvis TB 21.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alvis TB 21 | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Alvis | Mazda |
Model | TB 21 | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2992 cc | 3727 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 204 Nm | 269 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2340 mm |