1952 Alvis TB 21 vs. 2009 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alvis TB 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alvis TB 21 would be higher. At 2,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Alvis TB 21 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1952 Alvis TB 21. (91 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1952 Alvis TB 21.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (240 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Alvis TB 21. (204 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2009 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Alvis TB 21.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alvis TB 21 | 2009 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Alvis | Volkswagen |
Model | TB 21 | Polo |
Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2992 cc | 1896 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 204 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 95.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 19.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2470 mm |