1952 Alvis TB 21 vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alvis TB 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alvis TB 21 would be higher. At 2,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Alvis TB 21 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac BLS (179 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1952 Alvis TB 21. (91 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1952 Alvis TB 21.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac BLS (400 Nm @ 1850 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Alvis TB 21. (204 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Alvis TB 21.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alvis TB 21 | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | Alvis | Cadillac |
Model | TB 21 | BLS |
Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2992 cc | 1910 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 179 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 204 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 1850 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 90.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2680 mm |