1952 Alvis TB 21 vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alvis TB 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alvis TB 21 would be higher. At 2,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Alvis TB 21 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1952 Alvis TB 21. (91 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1952 Alvis TB 21.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Alvis TB 21. (204 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Alvis TB 21.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Alvis TB 21 | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | Alvis | Mazda |
| Model | TB 21 | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2992 cc | 2953 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 91 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Torque | 204 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 180 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 96.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 102 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 18.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3010 mm |
