1952 Alvis TB 21 vs. 2010 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alvis TB 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alvis TB 21 would be higher. At 2,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Alvis TB 21 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda CX-7 (161 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1952 Alvis TB 21. (91 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1952 Alvis TB 21.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda CX-7 (218 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Alvis TB 21. (204 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Alvis TB 21.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alvis TB 21 | 2010 Mazda CX-7 | |
Make | Alvis | Mazda |
Model | TB 21 | CX-7 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2992 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 204 Nm | 218 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4681 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1872 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2751 mm |