1952 Alvis TB 21 vs. 2010 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2010 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alvis TB 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alvis TB 21 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1952 Alvis TB 21. (91 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1952 Alvis TB 21.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota 4Runner (376 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Alvis TB 21. (204 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2010 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Alvis TB 21.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Alvis TB 21 | 2010 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Alvis | Toyota |
| Model | TB 21 | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2992 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 91 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 204 Nm | 376 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4823 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1925 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2789 mm |
