1952 Alvis TB 21 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alvis TB 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alvis TB 21 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (266 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1952 Alvis TB 21. (91 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1952 Alvis TB 21.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Alvis TB 21. (204 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Alvis TB 21.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alvis TB 21 | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Alvis | Cadillac |
Model | TB 21 | CTS |
Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2992 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 266 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 204 Nm | 302 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 11.7 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4877 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1842 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2880 mm |