1952 Aston Martin DB3 vs. 1989 Volvo 740
To start off, 1989 Volvo 740 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Aston Martin DB3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Aston Martin DB3 would be higher. At 2,922 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Aston Martin DB3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Volvo 740 (155 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1952 Aston Martin DB3. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Volvo 740 should accelerate faster than 1952 Aston Martin DB3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Volvo 740 weights approximately 367 kg more than 1952 Aston Martin DB3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Aston Martin DB3 (243 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Volvo 740. (203 Nm). This means 1952 Aston Martin DB3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Volvo 740.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Aston Martin DB3 | 1989 Volvo 740 | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Volvo |
| Model | DB3 | 740 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2922 cc | 2315 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 155 HP |
| Torque | 243 Nm | 203 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1005 kg | 1372 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1760 mm |
