1952 Aston Martin DB3 vs. 1997 Holden Nova
To start off, 1997 Holden Nova is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Aston Martin DB3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Aston Martin DB3 would be higher. At 2,922 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Aston Martin DB3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Aston Martin DB3 (138 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1997 Holden Nova. (106 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Aston Martin DB3 should accelerate faster than 1997 Holden Nova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Holden Nova weights approximately 60 kg more than 1952 Aston Martin DB3.
Because 1952 Aston Martin DB3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Aston Martin DB3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Holden Nova, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Aston Martin DB3 (243 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Holden Nova. (135 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1952 Aston Martin DB3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Holden Nova.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Aston Martin DB3 | 1997 Holden Nova | |
Make | Aston Martin | Holden |
Model | DB3 | Nova |
Year Released | 1952 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2922 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 243 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1005 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1690 mm |