1952 Aston Martin DB3 vs. 2000 Suzuki XL6
To start off, 2000 Suzuki XL6 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Aston Martin DB3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Aston Martin DB3 would be higher. At 2,922 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Aston Martin DB3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Aston Martin DB3 (138 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2000 Suzuki XL6. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Aston Martin DB3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Suzuki XL6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Suzuki XL6 weights approximately 440 kg more than 1952 Aston Martin DB3.
Because 2000 Suzuki XL6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Aston Martin DB3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Suzuki XL6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Aston Martin DB3 (243 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Suzuki XL6. (218 Nm). This means 1952 Aston Martin DB3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Suzuki XL6.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Aston Martin DB3 | 2000 Suzuki XL6 | |
Make | Aston Martin | Suzuki |
Model | DB3 | XL6 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2922 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 243 Nm | 218 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1005 kg | 1445 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1790 mm |