1952 Aston Martin DB3 vs. 2001 BMW M3
To start off, 2001 BMW M3 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Aston Martin DB3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Aston Martin DB3 would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW M3 (317 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1952 Aston Martin DB3. (138 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1952 Aston Martin DB3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW M3 weights approximately 545 kg more than 1952 Aston Martin DB3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW M3 (330 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Aston Martin DB3. (243 Nm). This means 2001 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Aston Martin DB3.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Aston Martin DB3 | 2001 BMW M3 | |
Make | Aston Martin | BMW |
Model | DB3 | M3 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2922 cc | 2926 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Torque | 243 Nm | 330 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1005 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1760 mm |