1952 Aston Martin DB3 vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Aston Martin DB3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Aston Martin DB3 would be higher. At 2,922 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Aston Martin DB3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1952 Aston Martin DB3. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1952 Aston Martin DB3.
Because 1952 Aston Martin DB3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Aston Martin DB3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Aston Martin DB3. (243 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Aston Martin DB3.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Aston Martin DB3 | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | Aston Martin | Holden |
Model | DB3 | Epica |
Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2922 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 243 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1810 mm |