1952 Austin A 30 vs. 1956 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1956 Toyota Master RR is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 30 would be higher. At 1,453 cc, 1956 Toyota Master RR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Toyota Master RR (40 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 30. (29 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1956 Toyota Master RR should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 530 kg more than 1952 Austin A 30. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin A 30 | 1956 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Austin | Toyota |
| Model | A 30 | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 803 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 29 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2540 mm |
