1952 Austin A 30 vs. 1970 Renault 4
To start off, 1970 Renault 4 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 30 would be higher. At 803 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Renault 4 (33 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 30. (29 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Renault 4 should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 30 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1970 Renault 4.
Because 1952 Austin A 30 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A 30. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin A 30 | 1970 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Austin | Renault |
| Model | A 30 | 4 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 803 cc | 747 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 29 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2410 mm |
