1952 Austin A 30 vs. 1984 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 30 would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 500 kg more than 1952 Austin A 30.
Because 1952 Austin A 30 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A 30. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin A 30 | 1984 Chrysler Le Baron | |
| Make | Austin | Chrysler |
| Model | A 30 | Le Baron |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 803 cc | 2212 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 29 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2630 mm |
