1952 Austin A 30 vs. 1996 Subaru Outback
To start off, 1996 Subaru Outback is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 30 would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Subaru Outback (165 HP) has 136 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 30. (29 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 30.
Because 1996 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Austin A 30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Subaru Outback (221 Nm) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 30. (54 Nm). This means 1996 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 30.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 30 | 1996 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Austin | Subaru |
Model | A 30 | Outback |
Year Released | 1952 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 803 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 29 HP | 165 HP |
Torque | 54 Nm | 221 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 58 mm | 99.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 79 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2530 mm |