1952 Austin A 30 vs. 2009 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2009 Holden Caprice is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 30 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Caprice (278 HP) has 249 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 30. (29 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 30.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Caprice (350 Nm) has 296 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 30. (54 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 30. 2009 Holden Caprice has automatic transmission and 1952 Austin A 30 has manual transmission. 1952 Austin A 30 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Holden Caprice will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin A 30 | 2009 Holden Caprice | |
| Make | Austin | Holden |
| Model | A 30 | Caprice |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 803 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 29 HP | 278 HP |
| Torque | 54 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
