1952 Austin A 40 vs. 1944 Renault Juva
To start off, 1952 Austin A 40 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Renault Juva would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin A 40 (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1944 Renault Juva. (24 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin A 40 should accelerate faster than 1944 Renault Juva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 40 weights approximately 162 kg more than 1944 Renault Juva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 40 | 1944 Renault Juva | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | A 40 | Juva |
Year Released | 1952 | 1944 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1003 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 972 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1410 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2360 mm |