1952 Austin A 40 vs. 1948 Ford Taunus
To start off, 1952 Austin A 40 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin A 40 (41 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1948 Ford Taunus. (34 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin A 40 should accelerate faster than 1948 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 40 weights approximately 170 kg more than 1948 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin A 40 | 1948 Ford Taunus | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | A 40 | Taunus |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1948 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 1172 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 34 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2390 mm |
