1952 Austin A 40 vs. 1953 Holden FX
To start off, 1953 Holden FX is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Holden FX (51 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (41 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Holden FX should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 40 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1953 Holden FX.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 40. (79 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1953 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 40 | 1953 Holden FX | |
Make | Austin | Holden |
Model | A 40 | FX |
Year Released | 1952 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 79 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2620 mm |