1952 Austin A 40 vs. 1954 Hudson Metropolitan
To start off, 1954 Hudson Metropolitan is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Hudson Metropolitan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 41 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 40 weights approximately 190 kg more than 1954 Hudson Metropolitan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin A 40 (79 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Hudson Metropolitan. (76 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1952 Austin A 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Hudson Metropolitan.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin A 40 | 1954 Hudson Metropolitan | |
| Make | Austin | Hudson |
| Model | A 40 | Metropolitan |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 41 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 79 Nm | 76 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2170 mm |
