1952 Austin A 40 vs. 1958 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 1958 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac Eldorado (204 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 1190 kg more than 1952 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 40 | 1958 Cadillac Eldorado | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | A 40 | Eldorado |
Year Released | 1952 | 1958 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 5980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 204 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 2190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3300 mm |