1952 Austin A 40 vs. 1959 BMW Isetta
To start off, 1959 BMW Isetta is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin A 40 (49 HP) has 36 more horse power than 1959 BMW Isetta. (13 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin A 40 should accelerate faster than 1959 BMW Isetta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 40 weights approximately 630 kg more than 1959 BMW Isetta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 40 | 1959 BMW Isetta | |
Make | Austin | BMW |
Model | A 40 | Isetta |
Year Released | 1952 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 247 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 1 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | single |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 13 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 1 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 2300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 1510 mm |