1952 Austin A 40 vs. 1959 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1959 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 6,380 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac DeVille (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1140 kg more than 1952 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 40 | 1959 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | A 40 | DeVille |
Year Released | 1952 | 1959 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 6380 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 2140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3310 mm |