1952 Austin A 40 vs. 1961 Chevrolet Corvair
To start off, 1961 Chevrolet Corvair is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,368 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Chevrolet Corvair is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Chevrolet Corvair (81 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Chevrolet Corvair should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Chevrolet Corvair weights approximately 198 kg more than 1952 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 40 | 1961 Chevrolet Corvair | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 40 | Corvair |
Year Released | 1952 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 2368 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 972 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 61 L |