1952 Austin A 40 vs. 1961 Maserati Tipo 64
To start off, 1961 Maserati Tipo 64 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,989 cc (12 cylinders), 1961 Maserati Tipo 64 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Maserati Tipo 64 (317 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 268 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (49 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Maserati Tipo 64 should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 40 weights approximately 348 kg more than 1961 Maserati Tipo 64.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 40 | 1961 Maserati Tipo 64 | |
Make | Austin | Maserati |
Model | A 40 | Tipo 64 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1961 |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 2989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 8200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 642 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2210 mm |