1952 Austin A 40 vs. 1963 Pontiac Tempest
To start off, 1963 Pontiac Tempest is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,524 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Pontiac Tempest (118 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Pontiac Tempest weights approximately 350 kg more than 1952 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 40 | 1963 Pontiac Tempest | |
Make | Austin | Pontiac |
Model | A 40 | Tempest |
Year Released | 1952 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 3524 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2930 mm |