1952 Austin A 40 vs. 1967 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1967 Cadillac Calais is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 990 kg more than 1952 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin A 40 | 1967 Cadillac Calais | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 40 | Calais |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1967 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1990 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3300 mm |
