1952 Austin A 40 vs. 1968 BMW 2000

To start off, 1968 BMW 2000 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 BMW 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 BMW 2000 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (49 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 BMW 2000 should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 40 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1968 BMW 2000.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 BMW 2000 (167 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 40. (83 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1968 BMW 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 40.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Austin A 40 1968 BMW 2000
Make Austin BMW
Model A 40 2000
Year Released 1952 1968
Body Type Convertible Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1200 cc 1991 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 49 HP 118 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 83 Nm 167 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3600 RPM
Engine Bore Size 65.5 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 89 mm 80 mm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 990 kg 960 kg
Vehicle Length 4060 mm 4570 mm
Vehicle Width 1560 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1260 mm
Wheelbase Size 2360 mm 2560 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 70 L