1952 Austin A 40 vs. 1969 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1969 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 6,954 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac DeVille (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 250 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1028 kg more than 1952 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 40 | 1969 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | A 40 | DeVille |
Year Released | 1952 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 6954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 972 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 79 L |