1952 Austin A 40 vs. 1973 Mazda 1000
To start off, 1973 Mazda 1000 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mazda 1000 (49 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mazda 1000 should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 40 weights approximately 258 kg more than 1973 Mazda 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin A 40 (80 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda 1000. (77 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1952 Austin A 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 40 | 1973 Mazda 1000 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | A 40 | 1000 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 80 Nm | 77 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 972 kg | 714 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2270 mm |