1952 Austin A 40 vs. 1974 Daihatsu Consorte
To start off, 1974 Daihatsu Consorte is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Daihatsu Consorte (57 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Daihatsu Consorte should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 40 weights approximately 302 kg more than 1974 Daihatsu Consorte.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 40 | 1974 Daihatsu Consorte | |
Make | Austin | Daihatsu |
Model | A 40 | Consorte |
Year Released | 1952 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 957 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65.5 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 66 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 972 kg | 670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2170 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 43 L |