1952 Austin A 40 vs. 1976 Maserati Bora
To start off, 1976 Maserati Bora is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 4,899 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Maserati Bora is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Maserati Bora weights approximately 440 kg more than 1952 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin A 40 | 1976 Maserati Bora | |
| Make | Austin | Maserati |
| Model | A 40 | Bora |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1976 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 4899 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2610 mm |
