1952 Austin A 40 vs. 1976 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1976 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 45 kg more than 1952 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 40 | 1976 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 40 | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1952 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2660 mm |