1952 Austin A 40 vs. 1977 Dodge Omni
To start off, 1977 Dodge Omni is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,715 cc (4 cylinders), 1977 Dodge Omni is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Dodge Omni (75 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (41 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Dodge Omni should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40.
Because 1952 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Dodge Omni (123 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 40. (79 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1977 Dodge Omni will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin A 40 | 1977 Dodge Omni | |
| Make | Austin | Dodge |
| Model | A 40 | Omni |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1977 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 1715 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 75 HP |
| Torque | 79 Nm | 123 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2530 mm |
